Class Action Category: Defective Medical Devices

Did you develop serious health problems after using Depo Provera birth control shots? Women across the country now face life-changing medical conditions, including brain tumors, after taking this injectable contraceptive. You deserve answers about how this happened and support for your recovery.

This article explains more about the Depo Provera lawsuits, including what medical conditions qualify for legal action and important deadlines for Minnesota residents seeking compensation.

At TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis, we help victims get the compensation they deserve for Depo Provera injuries. Our experienced legal team handles every aspect of your case while you focus on healing. We have helped hundreds of Minnesota families recover damages from negligent pharmaceutical companies.

Call for a FREE, no-risk Case Review Today. (612) TSR-TIME

What Is Depo Provera and Why Is There a Lawsuit?

Depo Provera is an injectable birth control medication that doctors administer every three months. While effective at preventing pregnancy, this drug has been linked to dangerous side effects, including meningiomas – tumors that develop in the membrane surrounding the brain and spinal cord.

Pfizer Inc., the manufacturer of Depo Provera, faces lawsuits because they allegedly knew about these serious health risks but failed to warn patients and doctors. TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis is looking to help women in Minnesota who have been injured by this drug seek compensation for their medical expenses, lost wages and other damages, as well as treatment for their ongoing health complications.

Who Is the Defendant in This Case and What Does the Lawsuit Allege?

Pfizer Inc., along with its subsidiaries Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC and Pharmacia LLC, are the primary defendants in the Depo Provera lawsuits. The lawsuit also names related companies, including Viatris, Inc, and Greenstone LLC, who manufactured and distributed generic versions of the drug.

The lawsuit alleges that Pfizer Inc. knew about the risk of meningiomas associated with Depo Provera but failed to adequately warn U.S. patients and doctors. Pfizer Inc. did add warnings about brain tumor risks to their European and Canadian labels, yet they did not provide similar warnings in the United States. This failure left American women in the dark about their risk of developing serious medical conditions, including meningiomas.

What Are Meningiomas and Why Are They Dangerous?

Meningiomas are tumors that grow in the protective lining around your brain and spinal cord. While most of these tumors are not cancerous, they can still cause serious health problems because they press against your brain tissue and nerves as they grow.

Depo Provera users may develop several types of meningiomas, each requiring different treatment approaches:

• Convexity Meningiomas (Parasagittal): Form on the surface of the brain, near the midline
• Skull Base Meningiomas (Basal): Develop at the bottom of the skull
• Spinal Meningiomas (Intra-spinal): Grow along the spinal cord
• Intraventricular Meningiomas: Form inside brain ventricles
• Posterior Fossa Meningiomas: Develop at the back of the skull

Some tumors are riskier than others to remove because of where they are located. This can limit treatment options available to a patient. If surgery is still possible, it can significantly impact recovery time.

What Symptoms or Side Effects Should I Watch For If I Took Depo Provera?

Women who took Depo Provera may experience serious health problems months or even years after stopping their injections. TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis helps Minnesota women who developed severe medical complications from this birth control medication.

Contact your doctor immediately if you notice any changes in your health after taking Depo Provera. Keep detailed records of your symptoms, when they started, and how they affect your daily life. These records strengthen your legal case.

• Neurological Changes: New or worsening headaches, vision problems, hearing loss, or seizures
• Cognitive Issues: Memory loss, confusion, difficulty concentrating, or personality changes
• Physical Symptoms: Unexplained weight gain, severe bone pain, unusual bleeding, or numbness
• Mental Health Changes: Severe depression, anxiety, or mood swings requiring medical attention
• Balance Problems: Difficulty walking, poor coordination, or frequent falls
• Speech Difficulties: Slurred speech, trouble finding words, or problems understanding
• Bone Health: Fractures, severe joint pain, or diagnosed bone density loss

Do I Qualify for a Depo Provera Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Depo Provera lawsuit if you received contraceptive injections and later developed meningiomas or other serious side effects. TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis wants to hear from Minnesota women who used Depo Provera between 1993 and 2024, even if you are not certain about the exact dates of your injections.

Key factors that strengthen your case include having documented medical records of your Depo Provera use, a confirmed diagnosis of a qualifying condition, and ongoing medical treatment. Your medical history and the timing of your symptoms play important roles in determining if you qualify for compensation.

Qualifying conditions may include:

• Meningioma (brain tumor)
• Vision or hearing loss
• Chronic headaches with neurological symptoms
• Stroke
• Severe depression with hospitalization

Even if you are not sure about the exact dates you used Depo Provera or other qualifying factors, TSR Injury Law wants to hear your story. Many women qualify for compensation even when they do not have complete records. Our legal team helps gather the necessary documentation to build your case.

Are There Deadlines for Filing a Depo Provera Lawsuit in Minnesota?

Minnesota law sets strict deadlines for filing Depo Provera lawsuits. You have six years from the date you discovered your injury was caused by Depo Provera to take legal action. However, this deadline might be shorter depending on the specific details of your case.

At TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis, we recommend contacting our office as soon as possible after discovering your injury. Early action helps preserve important evidence, ensures you meet legal deadlines, and gives you the best chance at receiving compensation for your injuries.

What Evidence Do I Need for a Depo Provera Lawsuit?

Medical Documentation Required:

• Medical records showing Depo Provera injections
• Dates and locations of your Depo Provera treatments
• Brain scan or MRI confirming meningioma diagnosis
• Surgery or treatment records for your tumor
• Documentation of ongoing medical complications
• Records of medical expenses and treatments

Personal Evidence That Strengthens Your Case:

• Pharmacy records of Depo Provera prescriptions
• Personal diary or calendar noting injection dates
• Records of missed work due to symptoms or treatment
• Documentation of lifestyle changes caused by your condition
• Photos or videos showing how injuries affect daily life
• Names of healthcare providers who gave injections

Contact TSR Injury Law to help collect and organize your evidence. Our experienced legal team knows exactly what documentation strengthens your case and how to obtain it from medical providers.

How May Depo Provera Victims Be Compensated?

TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis will represent Minnesota victims in the Depo Provera mass tort lawsuit against Pfizer Inc. A mass tort allows many victims with similar injuries to join together in seeking compensation, while still receiving individual settlements based on their specific injuries and circumstances.

When we represent you, we manage every aspect of your case so you can focus on healing. You can count on us to build a robust case on your behalf, from gathering medical evidence to negotiating with Pfizer Inc.’s attorneys. We are deeply committed to recovering the maximum possible compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, ongoing care needs, and pain and suffering.

Our trusted Minneapolis law firm advocates for injured victims every day. We have the experience, the staff and the resources to fight for the compensation you deserve.

How Long Do Depo Provera Lawsuits Take to Settle?

Mass tort lawsuits involve several stages before reaching settlement. The process begins with consolidating cases into a mass tort, followed by initial discovery phases where evidence is gathered and reviewed. During this time, some early cases may go to trial as “bellwether” cases to help determine potential settlement values.

Bellwether cases are carefully selected test cases that go to trial first. These trials help both sides understand how juries might respond to evidence and testimony, often influencing settlement negotiations for remaining cases.

While each case is different, mass tort lawsuits involving pharmaceutical companies often take several years to resolve. TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis works diligently to move your case forward while ensuring you receive fair compensation for your injuries. We keep you informed throughout the process and handle all legal proceedings so you can focus on your health.

What Are the Current Developments for Pending Depo Provera Lawsuits?

Since the March 2024 study linking Depo Provera to a significantly increased risk of meningiomas, lawsuits have been filed nationwide, with federal cases likely to be consolidated in early 2025. Despite implementing warnings in Europe and Canada, however, Pfizer Inc. has yet to update U.S. warning labels, making this a critical argument in the pending litigation.

Most Recent Developments (January 2025)

Litigation for these cases is gaining momentum, with a growing number of women filing lawsuits claiming a link between using Depo Provera and receiving a meningioma diagnosis. Currently a petition has been filed to consolidate existing cases into a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL).

On January 30, 2025, The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) will hear arguments on which state and court the Depo Provera lawsuits under MDL No. 3140 should be centralized. There are motions for this MDL to be in several states, including California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Florida.

April 2024 – Pfizer Inc. Acknowledges the Risk of Long-Term Depo Provera Use

Pfizer Inc. released a public statement acknowledging the potential risk associated with long-term use of progestogens and indicated they were working with regulatory agencies to update product labels and patient information.

March 2024 – Study Finds Depo Provera Users 5.5 Times More at Risk for Meningiomas

A pivotal British Medical Journal study found that Depo Provera users were 5.5 times more likely to develop meningiomas compared to non-users. This study served as a catalyst for the current wave of litigation.

Why Seek Legal Assistance for Depo Provera Injuries?

If you used Depo Provera and later developed a meningioma brain tumor, you may be eligible to seek compensation for you medical costs and other losses. We are prepared to evaluate your case and guide you through the legal process. Qualified attorneys can:

• Analyze your medical records and Depo Provera usage history
• Determine if you meet the eligibility criteria for filing a claim
• Handle all aspects of case documentation and filing
• Navigate both individual lawsuits and potential MDL participation
• Work with medical experts to establish causation
• Pursue fair compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages

Call 24/7 to schedule a consultation about a possible Depo Provera Lawsuit. (612) TSR-TIME.

How Much Does it Cost to Join a Depo Provera Lawsuit?

TSR Injury Law in Minneapolis takes Depo Provera cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no upfront costs to file your lawsuit, and we only receive payment if we win your case or secure a settlement on your behalf.

Our law firm covers all initial expenses, including:

• Filing fees
• Medical record collection costs
• Expert witness fees
• Investigation expenses
• Court costs
• Document preparation

Need Legal Help for Your Depo Provera Injuries? Contact TSR Injury Law Today

If you or a loved one has developed a meningioma after using Depo Provera, our experienced legal team at TSR Injury Law is here to help evaluate your case and fight for the compensation you deserve. We understand the devastating impact these brain tumors can have on your health, career and quality of life. Our attorneys have extensive experience in pharmaceutical injury cases and are actively reviewing Depo Provera claims.

Contact us today for a free, confidential consultation to discuss your legal options. This no-risk meeting is an opportunity to get answers to your questions and to learn whether you may have a case. Call TSR Injury Law today to learn how we can help you pursue justice and hold Pfizer Inc. accountable for failing to warn about the risks of Depo Provera.

Experienced Minneapolis Lawyers. Proven Results. (612) TSR-TIME

_{TSR Injury Law is working with another law firm.}

In September 2023, Philips Respironics agreed on a $479 million settlement of a class action lawsuit over defective CPAP machines. This comes just two years after Philips recalled more than 10 million CPAP and BiPAP devices which were linked to causing cancers and numerous other conditions.

If you were diagnosed with cancer or another severe illness after using a recalled CPAP machine, you may still be able to seek compensation. The settlement reimburses people for buying or renting defective machines, so injured victims can still file personal injury claims.

Call TSR Injury Law to schedule a free consultation to discuss a potential Philips CPAP recall lawsuit. Our firm has secured more than $1 billion on behalf of our clients, and we have been advocating for the injured for decades. There are no upfront costs with our services, which means no financial risk to you.

Our Minneapolis defective product lawyers are committed to seeking full compensation to help victims get their lives back.

Contact us today to learn more: (612) TSR-TIME.

Can I File a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit?

Anyone who used one of the recalled CPAP machines or ventilators and was later diagnosed with cancer or other severe health problems may be eligible to file a product liability claim. Some who used the recalled machines suffered damage to their liver and kidneys. Others suffered from asthma and breathing problems.

Other potential symptoms include:

These symptoms could indicate a severe underlying illness, like cancer or lung damage.

If doctors diagnose you with a severe illness, consider contacting a lawyer to discuss possible legal options. Philips may be liable for damages caused by these defective devices.

Philips may also be liable for failing to warn the public once they discovered the danger. As far back as 2015, there was an email exchange in which Philips said the polyester polyurethane foam in its devices deteriorated over time. Additionally, a November 2021 inspection report from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found the company received more than 222,000 complaints between January 2008 and November 2021.

These complaints included words like:

There was also an email from April 2018 that indicates the company knew there were reports of degraded foam entering patients’ airways. Just two months later, a breathing unit failed and needed repairs. The technician who did the repair found the affected part was carcinogenic.

Which CPAP Machines and Ventilators Were Recalled?

In 2021, Philips recalled the following CPAP machines:

Philips also recalled the following ventilators:

If you used any of these machines and were diagnosed with a severe illness, call TSR Injury Law to see if we can help you seek compensation. There is limited time to pursue a claim, so it is important to contact us as soon as possible.

Reasons For the Recall

The Philips CPAP recall is a Class I recall, which means the recalled product presents an immediate danger of severe health issues or death. The FDA considers this to be the most severe type of product recall.

The reason for the recall is the polyester-based polyurethane foam inside the device. Over time, the foam breaks down and particles may enter the ventilator or CPAP machine’s air pathway. This could lead to users ingesting these particles. Degradation of the foam could also release gases that could be toxic to device users.

People use these machines for sleep apnea, a condition that interrupts breathing while sleeping. These devices push air into the nostrils, so patients continue breathing easily throughout the night.

People with sleep apnea who are prescribed a CPAP machine use it every night to improve their sleep. That means users of the defective machines may have been exposed to defective foam repeatedly over an extended timeframe. This continued exposure could increase these individuals’ risk of serious health problems.

Patients who currently use a recalled device should contact their doctor right away to determine what to do next. This is likely to include prescribing a different device to mitigate the risk caused by sleep apnea.

Compensation For a Philips CPAP Case

Those who were severely injured by the defective Philips CPAP machines may be entitled to significant compensation. This may include the cost of cancer treatment, appointments with doctors, prescription medication, testing, pain and suffering or even damages for wrongful death caused by the product.

At TSR Injury Law, we are committed to seeking full compensation for our clients. While compensation does not change what happened, it can help victims obtain the medical treatment they need and help mitigate other financial consequences related to their illness.

An initial legal consultation is free and comes with no legal obligation to hire our firm. If you have a case, there are also no upfront fees. You can also rest assured we will be committed to your best interests.

What Is the Status of the Class Action Against Philips?

The September 2023 settlement is for $479 million to reimburse people who bought or rented the recalled CPAP machines or ventilators. The settlement also pays those who reimbursed patients for the cost of the devices.

The personal injury cases are part of a class action that was filed in Massachusetts in 2021. As of September 2023, there have been 716 cases in the class action.

Call Today To Discuss a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit

When product manufacturers put consumers at an unreasonable risk of injury, they should be held accountable for the damages they cause.

Those injured by defective Philips CPAP machines should contact an experienced lawyer to explore their potential legal options. An experienced lawyer can determine if you may have a case and guide you through the legal process.

Contact the defective product attorneys at TSR Injury Law to learn more. There are no upfront costs or legal obligations.

Call to schedule your free legal consultation: (612) TSR-TIME.

More than 20,000 lawsuits have been filed against DePuy over its failing hip implants, resulting in billions of dollars in compensation paid to victims.

If you received a DePuy hip implant that was recalled by the manufacturer (ASR Hip Resurfacing System or ASR XL Acetabular System) or one of the Pinnacle implants that was discontinued, and it failed or caused other medical problems that required revision surgery, such as damage to surrounding bone, muscle or other tissues, or severe pain, you be able to file a claim for damages.

There is no cost to review your situation in a free consultation with a licensed DePuy hip implant lawyer at TSR Injury Law. Over more than 20 years, we have obtained over $1 billion in compensation for our clients. Partner Nate Bjerke has fought for injured people against numerous large corporations, including Ford Motor Company, Amazon, General Motors and American Family Insurance. Bjerke is also a member of The National Trial Lawyers Top 100.

Your consultation is free and there are no upfront fees for our services – we do not get paid unless you do.

Call TSR Injury Law at (612) TSR-TIME.

Do I Have a Case Over My Injuries?

This is something you should consider discussing with a licensed DePuy hip implant lawyer, as there are many things we need to know about your situation, such as:

After reviewing these and other factors, we would have a better idea on whether you have a case. There is no fee or obligation for having a meeting with one of our attorneys.

We are here to help and answer your legal questions. We understand there are a lot of things victims want to know.

Compensation for Hip Implant Injuries

If you have a case and hire our firm to represent you, we may be able to file a claim for various damages you have suffered as a result of your failed hip implant.

For example, you may be able to claim past, current and future medical care. This could include the cost of your revision surgery, prescription medications for pain, physical therapy or ongoing appointments with doctors, and other expenses for necessary treatment of your injuries.

Our attorneys have obtained over $1 billion in compensation for our clients and understand how to calculate the full value of a claim, including the cost of future medical care victims may need.

Other damages that could be claimed in a DePuy hip implant lawsuit may include:

Punitive damages may also be available – a large percentage of most of the DePuy hip implant settlements are punitive damages. These are meant to punish the at-fault party and deter others from engaging in similar conduct in the future.

Have questions about the potential value of your claim? Contact TSR Injury Law for a free consultation. (612) TSR-TIME

Hip Implant Recall

In late August of 2010, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., part of Johnson & Johnson, recalled two of its hip replacement devices: ASR Hip Resurfacing System and ASR XL Acetabular System. These devices had been implanted in more than 93,000 people across the world and 30,000 people in the U.S.

The company initiated a recall because data from Australia said these implants had a failure rate that was higher than expected when used in traditional hip replacement on patients with small stature, which may include women and those who have weak bones.

DePuy’s statement also included statistics from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales – 13 percent of those who received the XL Acetabular implants and 12 percent of those who received the Hip Resurfacing implants needed revision surgery after just five years. Most hip implants are expected to last 15 years.

Between 2008 and 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had received about 300 complaints about ASR hip implants, with many of the patients who made those complaints needing to have the device replaced soon after implantation.

DePuy also took its Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants off the market in 2013 after the FDA tightened its regulations of these types of devices. These devices were linked to the same problems as the ASR implants.

Side Effects and Complications From DePuy Hip Implants

When DePuy’s metal-on-metal hip implants went on the market, it was hoped they would be long-lasting implants. Unfortunately, many patients who received these implants required revision surgery much sooner than expected. When the products were recalled, the company estimated that about 10,000 patients would need revision surgery.

Another complication patients have experienced is metallosis, which can destroy bone, muscle and tissue near the implant site. Metallosis occurs when metal rubs on metal and creates metallic debris, which can lead to severe inflammation in the tissue around the implant. This inflammation can make revision surgery more difficult.

The metal in DePuy’s recalled hip implants contains cobalt, and when excessive amounts of cobalt move into surrounding tissue, it can cause numerous health problems, such as:

Elevated levels of cobalt could also harm a pregnant woman’s baby.

Those who needed revision surgery often experienced pain when walking, standing up or putting weight on the side of the body with the implant. Patients also experienced pain in the hips and groin.

If you or a loved one received a DePuy hip implant and are experiencing significant pain and difficulty walking, or are experiencing symptoms of metallosis, contact your doctor immediately for treatment. After that, contact a licensed attorney from TSR Injury Law for a free consultation.

You may be eligible to file a DePuy hip implant lawsuit.

Lawsuits That Have Been Filed

More than 10,000 lawsuits have been filed over defective or failed DePuy ASR hip implants. There is a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Ohio with 1,104 actions pending as of December 2019.

The lawsuits that have been filed claim the company sold implants that were prone to fail prematurely and cause other health problems, such as metallosis, severe pain and limited mobility.

Victims also claim the company knew for years about problems with some of their implants but did not take steps to correct the problem. Documents that came out in one of the cases seem to show executives knew the implant was faulty but decided to keep it on the market anyway.

More than 10,000 lawsuits have also been filed over DePuy Pinnacle hip replacements, and as of December 2019, 9.977 were still pending in the MDL in the Northern District of Texas.

Lawsuits filed against DePuy have resulted in approximately $6.2 billion in jury awards to victims (some of the awards were later reduced):

• November 2013 – DePuy agrees to pay $4 billion to settle 8,000 lawsuits over ASR implants
• March 2015 – DePuy settles another 1,800 ASR cases for $420 million
• March 2016 – The second bellwether trial in the Pinnacle MDL results in a jury award of $502 million that is later reduced to $151 million
• December 2016 – Third pinnacle bellwether trial results in a jury award of $1 billion that was later reduced to $543 million
• November 2017 – The fourth bellwether trial results in a jury award of $247 million that was later reduced to $245 million

Contact a DePuy Hip Implant Lawyer for a Free Consultation

Medical devices can make life a lot easier for those with certain medical problems. Patients put a lot of trust in doctors who implant these devices and the companies that manufacture them.

When these devices fail and cause injury, victims may be able to file a lawsuit not only to pursue compensation for medical bills and other damages, but also to hold the manufacturer liable.

Our experienced attorneys at TSR Injury Law are dedicated to helping injury victims as they look to recover and move forward with their lives. We understand how important compensation can be in managing physical, financial and emotional damages.

Schedule a free consultation today. No obligation and no upfront fees for our services. Call (612) TSR-TIME.

Since 2012, thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Stryker over its defective hip implants. Patients have suffered severe complications and injuries, including metal poisoning, joint dislocation and bone fractures.

If you have suffered pain or illness following your Stryker hip implant surgery, you may be eligible for compensation for your pain and suffering and other damages.

Call TSR Injury Law to schedule a free consultation with one of our qualified attorneys. We are prepared to review the details of your situation and discuss whether you may be able to file a Stryker hip implant lawsuit. Our legal services are contingency-based, which means you do not pay us anything up front. We only get paid if you do. We have decades of combined legal experience and a proven track record of recovering compensation for our clients.

Call TSR Injury Law for your FREE consultation today: (612) TSR-TIME

Do I Have a Case Against Stryker?

Anyone who suffered severe injuries after receiving a Stryker hip implant may have a case for compensation. Some of the most common injuries resulting from Stryker hip implants include:

If you have experienced some of these symptoms or injuries following your Stryker hip implant replacement, we encourage you to contact a member of our experienced legal team to learn more about whether you may have a case. There are many factors our Bloomington defective product lawyers need to review.

We are available to speak with you 24/7 by online chat or phone: (612) TSR-TIME

Compensation Available After a Hip Implant Injury

There are economic and non-economic damages that may occur after receiving a defective hip implant. That is why the law allows victims to pursue compensation for these damages, if they can prove another party is at fault for them.

Common examples of damages from a defective product case include:

You may also be eligible to receive punitive damages, which are meant as punishment for severe or intentional negligence. Many of those large settlement awards you read about or hear about on the news include punitive damages.

There is limited time to take legal action, so it is important to contact a lawyer as soon as possible to find out if you have a valid case. Once the clock runs out, you may lose your right pursue compensation.

Contact TSR Injury Law with your questions about the legal process.

Stryker Recalls Hip Implants

Stryker began receiving complaints about a number of issues with its hip replacement devices as far back as 2005. In spite of these reports, Stryker did not immediately take steps to correct or address the issues. However, after 60-plus patient complaints of metal poisoning and the need for corrective surgery were received by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2012, Stryker issued recalls for its Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck stem implant devices.

Currently there are thousands of lawsuits involving Stryker hip implant devices pending in both state and federal courts. If you suffered illness or injuries following a Stryker hip implant surgery, we are prepared to help. If you have a case, our knowledgeable attorneys are ready to aggressively work to recover compensation for your damages.

Problematic Stryker Models Named In Lawsuits

There are several Stryker hip replacement models with reported issues that have been named in lawsuits, including:

• ABG II and Rejuvenate hip implants – Both of these models are modular hip stems that are implanted into the patient’s femur bone during a Total Hip Replacement surgery (THR). Reports of multiple complications, including soft tissue inflammation at the implant placement site and corrosion – or wearing away (called fretting) – of the component have resulted in a class action lawsuit against Stryker. The metal-on-metal corrosion of these components can be especially dangerous because the metal can flake off and be released into a patient’s bloodstream, causing metallosis, a type of metal poisoning.
• LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral heads – This device, called a taper lock, is a component that is used to connect the femoral neck and femoral head during hip implant surgery. There are various sizes and models of this component, but those made before 2011 have had an abnormally high failure rate. Unfortunately, when this component fails, it causes the patient to suffer mobility issues, along with pain, inflammation and other complications. Additionally, the taper lock can corrode and lead to metal poisoning and further joint instability. Patients with a failed taper lock will have to undergo additional revision surgery. Allegedly Stryker knew about this issue yet continued to allow more than 100,000 of these devices to be surgically implanted into patients. If you had Stryker hip replacement surgery and are suffering pain or other symptoms, we recommend that you seek medical attention and contact one of our knowledgeable lawyers to see if you may be eligible for compensation, including reimbursement if you require surgery.
• Tritanium Acetabular Shell implants – This is a hip socket replacement component that was designed to promote new bone growth and encourage the device to fuse to a patient’s own bones over time. However, with many patients, the hip implant loosened instead, causing new pain and the need for corrective surgery.

Additional models with known issues include the Accolade TMZF, Citation TMZF and Meridian TMZF. If you received a Stryker hip implant device and suffered any adverse issues, you may be eligible for compensation.

Call to Discuss a Possible Stryker Hip Implant Lawsuit

Stryker failed to warn consumers, physicians and others about the dangers associated with some of its hip implant devices. When a manufacturer fails in its duty to take reasonable steps to protect consumers from an unreasonable risk of injury, they should be held liable for any injuries that result.

If you or someone you care about was injured, suffered severe complications or became ill following a Stryker hip replacement surgery, we may be able to help you pursue compensation for any damages incurred. The legal team at TSR Injury Law has decades of combined experience and we are prepared to fight to protect your best interests and legal rights.

Call TSR Injury Law today at (612) TSR-TIME

If you received a transvaginal mesh implant to treat pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence and suffered serious complications, such as severe pain, organ damage or device migration, you may be eligible for compensation. Tens of thousands of lawsuits have been filed over complications from these implants and victims have been awarded millions in compensation.

Talking with an experienced defective product lawyer is an important step in the legal process. The attorneys at TSR Injury Law have been defending the rights of injury victims and their families throughout Minnesota for over two decades. Our firm has recovered $300 million in compensation awards on behalf of our clients, including a $3,750,000 settlement for a victim of a defective product.

Your consultation is confidential and you will not be obligated to let us represent you. You will not be charged any fees unless we win fair compensation for your claim.

Call TSR Injury Law today at (612) TSR-TIME.

Do I Have a Case for Compensation?

When a medical device like a transvaginal mesh implant causes an injury, victims should discuss it with an attorney, because there are many factors to review to determine if there may be a case for compensation, such as:

• Evidence of whether the product was excessively dangerous for its intended use
• The severity of your injuries
• Whether your injuries were directly caused by the mesh implant and would not have occurred otherwise
• When you received the implant
• Warnings provided by the manufacturer about the risks of the device

Transvaginal mesh implants have been made by several companies, including:

Some of the side effects and injuries from transvaginal mesh implants include:

These side effects/complications have happened to patients being treated for conditions like anterior compartment prolapse (cystocele), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Cystocele and POP are known to cause pelvic organs such as the bladder to move and press up against the vagina, which can cause pain and discomfort. This usually happens because the connections between the ligaments and pelvic floor muscles can weaken over time. Women usually suffer from these conditions after surgery or childbirth.

SUI is also referred to as stress incontinence and causes a person to lose urine unintentionally. Urine loss could occur both with simple movements like sneezing or coughing or with intense physical activity like heavy lifting or running.

Contact our firm today to schedule your free consultation. We know how to determine if you may have grounds for a lawsuit and what your case may be worth.

TSR Injury Law: (612) TSR-TIME.

What is the Value of a Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit?

This is a difficult question to answer without reviewing the specifics of your situation in a free consultation. Victims of defective products generally pursue compensation for things like medical expenses and pain and suffering.

For example, you may be eligible to seek compensation for the cost of revision surgery to remove the implants and to repair damage caused by the implant, such as internal organ damage. You may be able to seek compensation for the cost of prescription medication for pain management and to treat infections and other complications.

Our experienced attorneys are also prepared to seek compensation for the cost of future medical care after the conclusion of your case, along with compensation for the physical pain and emotional suffering you have endured.

In cases of severe negligence by product manufacturers, we may be able to pursue punitive damages. These are a form of punishment for negligent product manufacturers.

The damages that may be available depend on the specifics of your claim. Our firm is committed to pursuing the full value of your damages so you can obtain the treatment you need to begin moving forward with your life.

We are here to answer your legal questions.

FDA Stops Sale and Distribution of Transvaginal Mesh

In the spring of 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required makers of surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of anterior compartment prolapse to immediately stop the sale or distribution of these products.

The FDA’s order said the manufacturers did not provide reasonable assurance that the mesh is safe or effective, which they have been required to do since the FDA reclassified these products as class III on Jan. 5, 2016. Devices in this class are considered high risk and are subject to the FDA’s strictest device review process.

The FDA order also said patients who received a transvaginal mesh implant should see a health care professional if they experience any complications, such as pelvic or groin pain, pain during sex or persistent vaginal bleeding or discharge.

2011 Update

This was not the first time the FDA warned about the dangers of these products. In 2011, the FDA released an update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal mesh implants for treating pelvic organ prolapse.

The report stated that the risk of serious side effects associated with transvaginal mesh is not rare, which contradicts what was stated in the FDA’s 2008 Public Health Notification. The FDA identified 3,979 reports of injuries, deaths or malfunctions between Jan. 1, 2005 and Dec. 31, 2010.

The FDA also looked at peer-reviewed scientific literature, including all randomized controlled trials and some observational studies of data on adverse events associated with mesh to repair pelvic organ prolapse.

The review raised many safety concerns, including pain due to vaginal shortening, tightening and mesh contraction. They also found that patients who received mesh implants were suffering from complications not experienced by patients who underwent surgery without mesh.

Performance data also failed to show an improved clinical benefit of using transvaginal mesh over non-mesh repairs.

Schedule your free consultation today by calling TSR Injury Law at (612) TSR-TIME.

Lawsuits Against Transvaginal Mesh Manufacturers

More than 100,000 lawsuits have been filed against the manufacturers of transvaginal mesh by women who suffered injuries and complications after receiving these implants. The lawsuits make many allegations against the manufacturers, such as:

Tens of thousands of cases were consolidated into multidistrict litigations (MDLs), including lawsuits against Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard and Ethicon. These MDLs consolidated a total of 83,346 cases, but as of Jan. 2020, just 2,006 cases were still pending. Most of the cases were either settled, went to court and had juries reach verdicts or they were dismissed.

The first company to lose a transvaginal mesh lawsuit was C.R. Bard, back in 2012, when a $3.6 million verdict was awarded to a woman who suffered complications after receiving the mesh implant.

There have been several settlements that were kept confidential. However, there have also been some large verdicts for victims, including:

• $57 million from a Philadelphia jury for a woman who suffered severe, life-altering injuries from a Johnson & Johnson pelvic mesh product, including $7.1 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages
• $20 million from a Pennsylvania jury for a woman who suffered severe side effects from an Ethicon transvaginal mesh device, requiring several surgeries to remove the mesh
• $120 million from a Philadelphia jury for a plaintiff who suffered severe incontinency and chronic pain, among other severe injuries
• $80 million in damages, including $50 million in punitive damages for a woman who suffered pain during sex and vaginal bleeding after receiving a mesh implant to treat pelvic organ prolapse
• $120 million to settle 2,000-3,000 lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson

Our dedicated team of legal professionals is ready to answer any questions you may have about your transvaginal mesh implant claim.

Contact TSR Injury Law About a Possible Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit

Our experienced defective products lawyers are ready to review your situation in a free consultation to determine if you may have a viable case.

Partner Nate Bjerke, has been named a Top 100 Super Lawyer each year since 2014 and he is also part of The National Trial Lawyers Top 100. Nate has represented injured people against large corporations such as Walmart, Amazon, Ford Motor Company, BMW, Audi, Kia Motors, Kawasaki, General Motors, Michelin and Caterpillar.

Call us today to schedule your free case review. There is no risk involved as you will not be obligated to hire us for your case and you will not have to pay for any legal fees unless we win compensation for your claim.

TSR Injury Law: (612) TSR-TIME.

Hernia mesh is a surgical implant used to repair torn or damaged tissue to quicken the recovery process after hernia surgery. However, some patients that have received a hernia mesh implant have suffered severe complications that damaged their intestines, bowels and abdomen.

If you or a loved one needed revision surgery due to complications caused by a hernia mesh implant, you may be eligible to file a hernia mesh lawsuit. Thousands of lawsuits are currently pending against multiple manufacturers, most of which are part of federal multidistrict litigation.

The Bloomington defective product lawyers at TSR Injury Law are currently investigating these kinds of claims. We are prepared to review your situation and discuss your legal options during a free, no-obligation consultation. Over more than two decades, our firm has recovered over $1 billion for our clients, including a $3.75 million settlement in a defective product case. Co-founder and managing partner Steve Terry is on the Minnesota Association for Justice Board of Governors.

Our consultations are completely free and there are no upfront legal fees if we represent you. Our lawyers do not get paid unless you obtain a recovery.

Call anytime day or night to schedule a consultation about a possible hernia mesh lawsuit (612) TSR-TIME.

Do I Have a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?

This is not any easy question to answer until we learn more about your particular circumstances. Our attorneys need to review several factors to see if you may qualify to take legal action and pursue compensation for your injuries and damages:

• Date you underwent hernia repair surgery that used hernia mesh
• The manufacturer and brand of the hernia mesh product
• Name and location of hospital where implant surgery was done and the doctor who performed it
• Types of complications suffered, such as mesh migration, perforation, infection or organ damage
• Date when complications appeared and/or were diagnosed by a medical professional
• Date you had hernia mesh removed or revision surgery to correct complications

Some of the most popular hernia mesh products that have injured patients include:

If you have a case, there is a limited amount of time to file a lawsuit and if you fail to do so before the deadline passes you may forfeit your rights entirely. This is why it is in your best interest to speak to an experienced lawyer as soon as you can.

The consultation is 100 percent free and confidential. Call (612) TSR-TIME today.

How Much Could My Case Be Worth?

Complications from defective hernia mesh can result in mounting medical bills, painful revision surgery and other damages. A qualified lawyer from our firm is ready to help determine the full scope of your damages.

You may be able to recover economic and non-economic damages, such as:

To determine an accurate value of your damages, our legal team will also need to consider the severity of your hernia mesh injury, your medical prognosis, the expected length of your recovery, whether you have a disability, scarring or disfigurement, and how the injury affects daily activities or relationships with loved ones.

Why Seeking Legal Help May Be Beneficial

Manufacturers of medical devices are expected to produce products that are safe and effective to use. If a product fails to meet fulfill its intended purpose and causes harm, the manufacturer could be held liable.

Our licensed defective product lawyers have a proven track record holding negligent parties responsible for their actions and defending injury victims and their families who have been affected by these companies’ carelessness. We have the knowledge and resources to conduct a detailed investigation and gather supportive evidence to help build a strong case for compensation.

Do not hesitate to schedule a free consultation to determine if you may be able to file a hernia mesh lawsuit. We have helped many injury victims over the past two decades obtain fair compensation. While no amount of compensation can change what happened, it can hopefully aid in your medical recovery and help you move forward with your life.

Contact TSR Injury Law to see how we may be able to assist you. (612) TSR-TIME.

Dangers of Hernia Mesh Implants

Hernia mesh is a medical device that is implanted in the upper stomach, abdomen or groin. It is used to support weakened tissue or to close an opening within the damaged muscle that allows a hernia to pass through. Common types of hernia mesh used by doctors include Physiomesh and C-QUR mesh.

Although hernia mesh is supposed to lower the rate of hernia recurrence, some individuals have experienced serious, life-threatening complications, such as:

Hernia mesh removal, revision surgeries or additional procedures to improve quality of life and reduce painful complications are often required. Medical bills from hernia mesh complications can be costly, which is why should strongly consider getting a lawyer on your side to handle the legal process for you. We are ready to negotiate a fair settlement or go to trial, if needed.

FDA Action Against Hernia Mesh Products

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received countless adverse event reports linked to hernia mesh complications, causing the agency to take action against manufacturers for flawed or defective mesh.

From 2009 to 2013, the FDA conducted multiple inspections of facilities manufacturing C-QUR hernia mesh and inspectors uncovered various violations of federal regulations. This included violations of the quality system regulation, the medical device reporting regulation, and the correction and removal regulation.

In 2014, the agency issued a safety update warning consumers about the harmful effects of hernia mesh. A year later the FDA asked the court for an injunction against one mesh manufacturer after the company ignored repeated warnings about problems at its facility. The injunction blocked C-QUR manufacturing and sales until the manufacturer resolved the issues.

By 2018, over 500 adverse events for various surgical mesh products were reported to the FDA each month. This includes more than 300 reports for Physiomesh and 200 reports for C-QUR mesh for the first three months of 2018.

Hernia Mesh Recalls Issued

Brands that have recalled hernia mesh products include Atrium Medical, Bard Davol, and Ethicon. From 2005 to 2018, manufacturers recalled over 211,000 units of hernia mesh or withdrew them from the market.

Some manufacturers have recalled mesh due to packing errors, but most hernia mesh has been recalled due to bowel perforations and bowel obstructions in those who have been implanted with medical device.

Atrium Medical recalled more than 145,000 units, including C-QUR hernia mesh products, for packing problems. Bard Davol issued several recalls of its Kugel Mesh product due to the potential for bowel tears. Ethicon voluntarily withdrew Physiomesh after studies determined that the medical device was more likely to result in a failed hernia repair compared to other similar products.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Filed

Thousands of individuals have filed hernia mesh lawsuits claiming the devices failed or caused serious health complications. After implantation, most hernias came back, the mesh damaged internal organs, and further surgery was needed to remove the faulty mesh. Other allegations include:

• Designing a dangerous and defective product with an unreasonable risk of adverse reactions
• Selling a product that failed to reasonably perform as intended and required surgical removal
• Failing to warn consumers and doctors of known risks associated with mesh products

About 4,780 hernia mesh lawsuits from across the U.S. have been combined into three different mass litigations. Each of the multidistrict litigations or MDLs, involves a separate hernia mesh manufacturer – Atrium Medical, Bard Davol and Ethicon. The number of lawsuits in these litigations continues to grow.

Additionally, the New Jersey Supreme Court has consolidated 62 physiomesh lawsuits into a multicounty litigation. The first hernia mesh trials are not expected to begin until sometime in 2020.

Call TSR Injury Law to See If You Can Take Legal Action

Manufacturers have a legal duty to produce safe and effective products and warn consumers about the potential complications of these products. When they fail in this duty and consumers become injured, these companies should be held accountable and the victims should be compensated for their damages.

If you or a loved one has suffered complications from surgical mesh and required hernia repair surgery, contact the legal team at TSR injury law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation.

Our personal injury lawyers have recovered over $1 billionf on behalf of our clients. It costs you nothing to hire us and we only get paid for our services if you obtain a recovery.

Call (612) TSR-TIME today to discuss your potential legal options.